On Sat, 09 Mar 2013 19:20:08 +0100
Reindl Harald <h.reindl(a)thelounge.net> wrote:
> "When I asked you to repost with just a link, I didn't
mean also
> attach the orig email with the 20k spec file that was the reason the
> mail was too long in the first place."
maybe you should make clearer what you want if you force people to
search in their archives because add the SPEC was a niceness from me
to explain the rest of my post - my "mariadb.spec" is much smaller as
many posts
To be clear, this was me, in my role as moderator of this list.
I just don't think every subscriber on this list wants a copy of your
mariadb spec when interested people can just follow a link to it.
> The moderator gave the following reason for rejecting your
request:
> "Can you file a bug with your suggested mysql improvements, and/or
> repost this with just a link to your spec. Thanks"
my post contained the SPEC-file which is plaintext and the sources and
patches are the same as in the MariaDB src.rpm from koji, and as i
said there are a lot of changes besides the Obsoltes/Provides which
are far away from fedora guidelines
Right. I suggest you file a bug and note your specific improvements
for the mariadb maintainers. They can evaluate them, there's no reason
it needs to be on the list.
kevin