On Thu, 2008-04-24 at 09:03 -0200, Thomas M Steenholdt wrote:
Tomas Mraz wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-04-24 at 06:23 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 11:01:15AM +0200, Tomas Mraz wrote:
>>>> desktop centric and lacks generality. Some pieces are even close to be
>>>> unusable outside of desktops (e.g. NM, PA, SELinux).
>>> SELinux? You have to be kidding, aren't you?
>> Show me an in-production server doing anything slightly out of the bounds of
>> the expected, and I'll show you a machine with SELinux turned off. :)
>
> That it is not yet super-easy to use SELinux on servers doesn't mean
> that it is unusable. It is perfectly possible to use it on most servers
> but it of course requires some effort from the sysadmin to learn it.
Really, adding */sbin/ to PATH or individual commands should be no
different, right?
I do not argue with you at all. I do not think that */sbin should be
added to user's PATH by default. My vote is for moving/symlinking
commands which are useful for regular users.
--
Tomas Mraz
No matter how far down the wrong road you've gone, turn back.
Turkish proverb