On Sun, 2017-09-03 at 16:13 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Sat, 2017-09-02 at 14:10 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> On Sep 2, 2017 11:36 AM, Adam Williamson <adamwill(a)fedoraproject.org>
> wrote:
> So I'm gonna start working on the 6.9.9 downgrade in F27, and I'm
> tempted to just downgrade Rawhide at the same time, and if we
> actually
> do decide to try 7 again, we can start over at that time. Do you
> agree
> with that plan? Thanks! (It doesn't change anything about the
> required
> epoch bumps, because even if we did 6.9.9 in F27 and stayed with 7
> in
> Rawhide, we'd need to bump the epoch on *both* to ensure Rawhide's 7
> was ahead of F27's 6).
>
> Based on the response from ImageMagick let's rebuild for version 6 in
> F27+. We should keep 7, but as ImageMagick7 instead.
Well if we go to have ImageMagick6 and ImageMagick7 in F27+ and since
ImageMagick7 should be the main package, in my point of view , we
should add ImageMagick6 package and maintain ImageMagick as is , like,
for example, openssl-1.1 and compat-openssl10 .
Nope, that's exactly the opposite of what FESCo agreed: IM7 can only go
in as the *variant* package, not the main one. The main one must be
IM6.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net