On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 8:37 AM, Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)scrye.com> wrote:
On Mon, 23 Feb 2015 08:11:20 -0500 (EST)
Bohuslav Kabrda <bkabrda(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> I have to inform you that I had to revert the "Python 3 Migration
> Improvements" change for F22 - more precisely, its parts that
> would've caused both Python 2 and Python 3 being on atomic host or
> minimal cloud image. The reason is mentioned in [1] - in short,
> policycoreutils-python3 has only partial functionality compared to
> policycoreutils-python, which I didn't understand from my
> communication with its maintainers previously. It's too late to
> implement and repackage that now, so I'm reverting the change.
...snip...
> Thanks for understanding. And huge thanks goes to everyone who took
> part in this effort. We really did tons of work and were very close -
> for F23, we're doing this!
>
> Regards,
> Slavek
>
> (damn, this was hard to write...)
I understand, but I think you made the right call. ;)
We can do this right in F23 and get everything lined up now.
Thanks a lot for all your work on this change. Its really appreciated
by me at least.
Yes, same from me as well. This is a great example of how a Change
should look when we reach and don't quite make it. Great
communication throughout.
Thanks again.
josh