On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 12:26:49AM -0900, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
On Jan 25, 2008 12:08 AM, Patrice Dumas <pertusus(a)free.fr>
wrote:
> Unless I am wrong new builds aren't allowed for EOL releases. And I also
> guess that at some point mirrors are shut down. Not doing those 2 things
> would really allow for a fedora LTS.
Until someone comes up with a sound plan for an LTS deliverable that
communicates expectations on quality, I don't see a reason to just
open up the trees for random people to update random packages whenever
they want to.
Random packages, maybe, but not random people, please.
And there should not be any quality expectation just like for fedora
itself.
--
Pat