On Wednesday 18 June 2008 07:29:32 am Manuel Wolfshant wrote:
Jarod Wilson wrote:
> On Tuesday 17 June 2008 07:17:44 pm Manuel Wolfshant wrote:
>> connect-proxy is dead-simple, but dunno how many people
>>
>>> actually have use for it (I did 3 years ago, notsomuch anymore...).
>>
>> Just for the record (after reading
>>
http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewcvs/rpms/connect-proxy/devel/connect-pr
>>oxy .spec?rev=1.3&view=markup ) shouldn't %source be
>>
http://www.meadowy.org/~gotoh/ssh/connect.c rather than the filename
>> that is used now ?
>
> Did you miss the two lines after the Source0 line? :)
Yes, I did. I did not read the comments :) That should teach me to
[re]act at 3 AM...
:)
> -----
> Source0: connect-%{version}.c
> # Real source listed below, it was renamed for sanity's sake
> #Source0:
http://www.taiyo.co.jp/~gotoh/ssh/connect.c
> -----
>
> I find renaming it much less ugly to deal with multiple versions,
> particularly given the sucktitude of cvs.
only that this breaks the scripts which download the source from web and
verify md5/sha1
Using the full url the the unversioned source is prone to failure too. If
there's a new connect.c posted, the checksums aren't going to match, and
you're right back where we started.
--
Jarod Wilson
jwilson(a)redhat.com