Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Jon Ciesla wrote:
> Additionally, what will this do to RHEL? I can't imagine RHEL customers
> being too happy about this for RHEL7(?), and if i386 would still be in
> RHEL, it would worry me that it would only be a secondary arch in
> Fedora. . .
>
>
Can the myth of "RH controls Fedora's direction" please die?
Pretty please? With sugar on top?
I don't recall saying that it was. I simply thinking long term about
consequences for Fedora's most prominent downstream, even though it's
not my job.
--
in your fear, speak only peace
in your fear, seek only love
-d. bowie