08.03.2012 20:24, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 03/08/2012 04:18 AM, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
> 08.03.2012 01:16, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>> On 03/06/2012 01:29 PM, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
>>> 05.03.2012 21:47, Sérgio Basto wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 2012-03-05 at 21:11 +0400, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
>>>>> 05.03.2012 01:04, Sérgio Basto пишет:
>>>>>> On Sun, 2012-03-04 at 19:33 +0100, Mario Santagiuliana wrote:
>>>>>>> In data domenica 26 febbraio 2012 18:39:14, Pavel Alexeev ha
>>>>>>> scritto:
>>>>>>>> Hello.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ImageMagick-6.7.6-5 will land to rawhide in short time.
Soname
>>>>>>>> change
>>>>>>>> happened (.so.5), so dependency rebuild needed.
>>>>>> Does it land on F17 ? , if not, why ?
>>>>> Do you think it have worth? I ready to do it.
>>>> yes , not in koji ?
>>> Ok, that's done.
>>>
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ImageMagick-6.7.5.6-3.fc17
>>>
>>>
>>
>> If you're going to push this to F17, please submit a buildroot
>> override and
>> we're going to need to rebuild everything that needs it in F17.
> Do you mean I should submit ticket for that? Unfortunately I'm not
> provenpackager and have no such capability to rebuild deps. But rуфвн
> вщdo
> that or anything to help.
Anyone can submit a buildroot override now here:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/override/new
Then you should notify all relevant package owners that they need to
do a rebuild.
I want push now builds perl-GD-SecurityImage-1.71-3.fc17
techne-0.2.1-4.fc17 gdl-0.9.2-5.fc17 calibre-0.8.39-1.fc17
autotrace-0.31.1-29.fc17.1 ImageMagick-6.7.5.6-3.fc17 with tat build
overrides but got error from bodhi what ImageMagick-6.7.5.6-3.fc17
update already exists. Should I delete it first and unpushing is not enough?
Pfstools update also already exists -
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pfstools-1.8.3-7.fc17 . So it
does not included there. I hope its landed in repos in parallel and that
deletion is not necessary.
>> Would be nice to have a single update for all if possible. I would
>> suggest
>> unpushing from F17 testing until the rebuilds are done as well.
>>