On Sun, 12 Nov 2006 18:44:42 -0500, Warren Togami wrote:
Warren Togami wrote:
> Gilboa Davara wrote:
>>> I'm pretty annoyed by this as well. So I am soon submitting an
>>> alternative short-term solution to Extras.
>>>
>>> The real solution is to make browser plugins run out-of-process.
>>> This would have tremendous benefits to us in the long-term. I am
>>> skeptical however that it will happen in a timely manner.
>>>
>>
>> You thinking about submitting nspluginwrapper?
>>
>> - Gilboa
>>
>
> No. It is broken and requires lots of work. You will see my submission
> soon.
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215256
Yes, this really sucks.
Ugly indeed. Are you serious about building this as x86_64, ppc64 and
s390x, but with a non-32-bit-specific dependency on "firefox"? You end up
with an x86_64 package to be used for an i386 firefox, a ppc64 package for
a ppc firefox, and so on. It's also possible to uninstall 32-bit firefox
and keep this package including the trigger and the menu entry.
With regard to the bottom half of the %description, there is one big
question: *Why* isn't it done?