man, 14.03.2005 kl. 18.28 skrev Harald Hoyer:
Rex Dieter wrote:
> Yeah, and then *every* revision of the rpm needs to be made available in
> order to construct every possible patch (unless *only* patches from the
> base rpm are ever released, which, IMO, would be bad in other ways).
why?
The server has the FC-3 released rpm, the newest update rpm, and the newest
delta from the released to the newest.
client checks for new rpm
if there is a new one:
if there is not a local released-rpm (maybe on CD):
if there is an old update and old delta?:
reconstruct the released rpm, by reverse delta
download the delta
apply delta to the released-rpm > newest
install newest-rpm
else:
download the newest-rpm
download the delta (to later create the released-rpm)
install newest-rpm
else:
download the delta
apply delta to the released-rpm > newest
install newest-rpm
The update app could ask to insert the appropriate CD to get the released-rpm.
We can't make a system be dependent on using CD's. Either it uses old
versions stored on *disk* (anaconda install option - if you are on a
broadband, it isn't worth it. If you are on a modem, copy all rpm's to
some place), or it downloads the whole thing. Please no "please insert
CD 3!" "CD3? I did a network install?!?" "please insert CD3"
"OMG!!!"