On Tue, 7 Apr 2015 08:38:57 -0500
Bruno Wolff III <bruno(a)wolff.to> wrote:
On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 10:22:25 -0300,
Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
<paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andrade(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I had also switched back to yum in rawhide due to --skip-broken,
> and
>in a few updates not even needing it (I would first see what is
>broken, and if not something "vital", use --skip-broken), while dnf
>would just fail with cryptic messages. I can keep up if kde or gnome
>is broken, or some other stuff that does not prevent boot and a
>functional system.
dnf really does need --skip-broken like support if it is to replace
yum. yum can be a lot faster than the needed work around to get dnf
to work equivalently. I am considering going back to yum in rawhide
rather than continuig to test dnf in rawhide because of this issue.
dnf's default behavior is like yum with --skip-broken already.
If thats not working and you need to find out more, add '--best' to see
things without 'skip-broken'.
If that still doesn't work, please file a bug. ;)
kevin