On 04/10/2015 02:03 PM, Michael Schroeder wrote:
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 01:54:12PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> So check-update might be useful for some script, but it is not useful
> command for common user. Not mentioning that man page basically says:
> "Please note that having a specific newer version available for an
> installed package (and reported by check-update) does not imply that
> subsequent dnf upgrade will install it. The difference is that dnf
> upgrade must also ensure the satisfiability of all dependencies and
> other restrictions". In other words, it says it is more or less
> unreliable command.
If you want to reliable force an update to the newest packages,
use 'dnf upgrade --best'.
Except of people, who prefer not receiving updates/bugfixes and want to
live with an outdated system, it's what everybody will want.
Ralf