Seth Vidal wrote:
On Tue, 25 Nov 2008, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Patrice Dumas (pertusus(a)free.fr) said:
>>> To an extent. We block packages every release that serve no purpose
>>> any more.
>>
>> You should not, they should be orphaned.
>
> If a package's entire function has been subsumed by another package,
> there's
> no point in going through an orphan cycle.
but it should be obsoleted by _something_.
fedora-release ?
Although I agree with Patrice, it seems more natural to orphan it and
let Darwin's law do its job...
-denis