On Mon, 2013-07-22 at 12:13 -0600, Eric Smith wrote:
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 10:52 AM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
<johannbg(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On 07/22/2013 04:41 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> They chose to use a _downstream_ distribution. RHEL *is* Fedora, it's
>> just a Fedora that's been hardened and held to a certain level of
>> ABI/API compatibility.
> Which is my point exactly instead of helping increasing the overall quality
> of Fedora the infrastructure decide to run to another distribution.
>
> RHEL != Fedora
But it's not an objective of Fedora to have long-term-stable releases
suitable for running servers! No one in their right mind runs any
rapid development distribution (not just Fedora) on critical
infrastructure.
Is _that_ why the nice men in white coats keep showing up and taking me
away to the bouncy bouncy room?!
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net