On 06/03/2012 12:12 AM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
At the same time I don't want to be obliged to support something
I
don't want to. There are many more important things to deal with in
the distribution than a stupid secure boot feature.
Let's narrow it down. Can you give a clear and specific example of a
situation where you believe one of the packages you maintain will be
affected by this feature?
Rahul