On 10/31/07, Rahul Sundaram <sundaram(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
Christopher Stone wrote:
> On 10/31/07, Rahul Sundaram <sundaram(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>> It would be fantastic if the backend was more neutral like you said
>> since there are people who might want to run any display manager with
>> any desktop environment. Meanwhile, throwing around accusations instead
>> of looking at what KDE maintainers as well as users want in Fedora is
>> counter productive. Just a while back I was accused of having an agenda
>> against KDE [1]. Now I get accused of having an agenda towards KDE [2].
>> I guess, the next one to follow would be XFCE [3]. Others would accuse
>> Red Hat of crippling KDE and the routine will continue. Next time,
>> don't wonder why.
>>
>> Rahul
>>
>>
[
1]https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-games-list/2007-September/msg000...
>>
>> [
2]https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-October/msg02680...
>>
>> [
3]http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/RahulSundaram/XfceLive
>
> While I agree with what you have said in this thread, I certainly got
> the impression you were doing everything within your means to avoid
> having any kde games in the games spin. I really don't know why you
> brought that up here, if you want to continue the discussion about the
> games spin, please add to the thread on the games list or in private
> with me. Thank you. Sheesh.
I am uninterested in that discussion again. Generally people could be
more courteous instead of throwing around accusations of bias without
understanding the factors involved. We can do better.
I still do not understand why you brought it up again in this thread
especially in light of the fact that you are not interested in it.
I guess you want everyone on the fedora devel list to analyze the
games thread and try and determine if my accusations of bias were
unjustified (which they were not).
Did I not clearly ask that you send this to me either in private or
start up the thread again on the games list?