On Wed, 11 Sep 2013 10:11:12 -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
The problem is that many (most?) programs won't handle this well.
example, how does mc handle having its perl scripts installed but
The "missing extfs.d script" case is trivial. MC simply doesn't offer
a virtual filesystem for the file type.
If the script interpreter is missing, it prints a detailed "bad
In addition, the package managers need some way later to easily
uninstalled soft dependencies, so when mc doesn't work, someone can just
say "add what's needed", rather than end-users having to hunt down what
is really required to make the external scripts work.
Perhaps similar to a reinstall of "mc", asking the user about what
optional deps to add. And hopefully it's not subpackages that contain
optional deps with the user running into trouble finding the package
which to reinstall/enhance.