Fedora 10 Feature Process
by John Poelstra
Hello Fedora 10,
Fedora 9 completed the second iteration of the Fedora Feature process.
It seemed to run a little smoother than things did with Fedora 8. The
gist of the feedback I heard was that the marketing and documentation
groups loved the feature pages and information they provided while some
developers thought creating and updating the feature pages was too much
work and other developers found it to be no problem at all.
So before we start the next round of Feature Acceptance process by FESCo
I wanted to open a dialogue here that could carry over to the FESCo
meeting on 2008-05-29 whereby FESCo could vote to amend the existing
policy based on the constructive feedback received.
I have created a wiki page to track this process here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/F10PolicyReview
Key proposals so far include:
* Tracker bugs for each feature
* Better test plan information
* No incomplete feature form sections
Admittedly one of the next things we will need is an application to
track this process so we can get away from using the wiki. I'm open to
any volunteers who would like to help write such an application or could
propose an existing open source tool that would handle the current
information we request and track for new features.
Thanks,
John
_______________________________________________
Fedora-devel-announce mailing list
Fedora-devel-announce(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-announce
16 years
perl 5.10 include location
by Orion Poplawski
Is there some tool one should use to determine the location of the perl
5.10 include files (e.g.:
/usr/lib/perl5/5.10.0/i386-linux-thread-multi/CORE)?
--
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222
NWRA/CoRA Division FAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane orion(a)cora.nwra.com
Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com
16 years
QTDIR -> 3.3?
by Neal Becker
pkg-config --variable=prefix qt-mt
/usr/lib64/qt-3.3
Is this correct on F9? Shouldn't be qt4?
This is used in /etc/profile.d/qt.sh
16 years
Evolution / gtk problem in rawhide
by Paul F. Johnson
Hi,
Is anyone else seeing this?
Some emails appear in the preview screen and when you hit reply to be
just grey screens and if, when composing an email, the edit pane
requires scroll bars, anything past the area that needs the scroll bars
also turns grey so you can't actually see what you're doing?
I'm not sure if I should file this under GTK or Evolution.
Using x86_64
TTFN
Paul
--
Sie können mich aufreizen und wirklich heiß machen!
16 years
Known Bugzilla disadvantage (Was: Re: Evolution / gtk problem in rawhide)
by Peter Lemenkov
Helo
2008/5/21 Paul <paul(a)all-the-johnsons.co.uk>:
> Hi,
>
> Is anyone else seeing this?
>
> Some emails appear in the preview screen and when you hit reply to be
> just grey screens and if, when composing an email, the edit pane
> requires scroll bars, anything past the area that needs the scroll bars
> also turns grey so you can't actually see what you're doing?
>
> I'm not sure if I should file this under GTK or Evolution.
Known Bugzilla disadvantage - you can't submit bug to many developer's
teams (team "Evolution" and team "GTK"). Instead you will be forced to
make some assumptions (probably wrong ones).
On the other hand, Bugzilla 3.2 is coming so maybe some things will be easier?
http://jons-thoughts.blogspot.com/2008/05/red-hat-bugzilla-32-beta1-up.html
--
With best regards!
16 years