Two weeks ago we had:
23000 spec files in Fedora (wow, nice round number :) )
29503license tags in all spec files
18744 tags have not been converted to SPDX yet
7157tags can be trivially converted using `license-fedora2spdx`
Progress: 36% ░░░███████ 100%
ELN subset:
- 1987 out of 4704 packages are not converted yet
Today we have:
* 23030 spec files in Fedora (wow, nice round number :) )
* 29532license tags in all spec files
* 18604 tags have not been converted to SPDX yet
* 7059tags can be trivially converted using `license-fedora2spdx`
* Progress: 37% ░░░███████ 100%
ELN subset:
* 1907 out of 4567 packages are not converted yet
The list of packages needed to be converted is again here:
https://pagure.io/copr/license-validate/blob/main/f/packages-without-spdx-fi...
List by package maintainers is here
https://pagure.io/copr/license-validate/blob/main/f/packages-without-spdx-fi...
List of packages from ELN subset that needs to be converted:
https://pagure.io/copr/license-validate/blob/main/f/eln-not-migrated.txt
New version of fedora-license-data has been released.
Legal docs and especially
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/legal/allowed-licenses/
was updated too.
I updated the progress in this spreadsheet:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1QVMEzXWML-6_Mrlln02axFAaRKCQ8zE807rp...
New projection when we will be finished is 2024-08-19. Pure linear approximation.
If your package does not have neither git-log entry nor spec-changelog entry mentioning SPDX and you know your license tag matches SPDX formula, you can put your package on ignore list
https://pagure.io/copr/license-validate/blob/main/f/ignore-packages.txt
Either pull-request or email to me is fine.
Why SPDX Hackfest edition? Because **today** we organize hackfest where we show you example of conversion and you will have opportunity to talk to us (both lawyers and engineers).
https://communityblog.fedoraproject.org/fedora-legal-spdx-hackfest/
Note: this was rescheduled so you may find two dates there. The valid one is 2023-05-17
Do you hesitate how to proceed with the migration? Please follow
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/legal/update-existing-packages/
or attend SPDX office hours (see different thread in this mailing list)
Miroslav
On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 08:23:51AM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
If your package does not have neither git-log entry nor spec-changelog entry mentioning SPDX and you know your license tag matches SPDX formula, you can put your package on ignore list
https://pagure.io/copr/license-validate/blob/main/f/ignore-packages.txt
Either pull-request or email to me is fine.
The 'yajl' package uses the ISC license, and the Fedora & SPDX names match, so no update is required. Please add to the ignore list.
If any other packages in Fedora exist with merely 'ISC' license they also can potentially be ignored.
With regards, Daniel
Dne 19. 05. 23 v 13:01 Daniel P. Berrangé napsal(a):
https://pagure.io/copr/license-validate/blob/main/f/ignore-packages.txt
Either pull-request or email to me is fine.
The 'yajl' package uses the ISC license, and the Fedora & SPDX names match, so no update is required. Please add to the ignore list.
Added. Thank you.
Miroslav