Is Fedora a business-level distribution or not? If it is, then fine, leave it in. But if it isn't, let us at least be honest about how few people at home and small/medium organizations are using it and reconsider our fascination and dedication to it.
Let's try your thought experiment on something more fundamental to Fedora:
"Let's be honest about how few people at home and small/medium organizations are using Linux and reconsider our fascination and dedication to it."
Take that one step further. Fedora legacy is targeting RH 7.3 and RH 9. What happens in a year or two or three or four when RH 7.3 and RH9 are *FINALLY* truly dead. We're going to have to shove a stake in the ground at a Fedora release and say "This is the new fedora legacy" and flagellate 'er support it for a few years as a production OS. I'd be pretty cranky if I had to perform micro-surgery on a perfectly good distribution to add a tool like kerberos (that should have been there in the first place).
/me pours a little gas on the fire... /me rubs hands together...
-Chuck
-- Quantum Linux Laboratories - ACCELERATING Business with Open Technology * Education | -=^ Ad Astra Per Aspera ^=- * Integration | http://www.quantumlinux.com * Support | chuckw@quantumlinux.com
A: Because we read from top to bottom, left to right. Q: Why should i start my reply below the quoted text?