Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 08:36:39AM -0400, Michael DeHaan wrote:
> Thought that was discussed on IRC already and also in person, if that
> wasn't clear, I apologize.
>
<snip>
No, the stuff you mentioned below was discussed. But, I don't think that
excludes others who aren't using those bits, or won't be, from using the
Ruby bindings.
I don't know of anyone using those bits, which is why I asked here, yes.
If some one wants to keep them up2date with all recent cobbler changes
and also give them object-edit support, they can stay, but we shouldn't
keep them around if they can't do everything cobbler XMLRPC can do --
it's a source of confusion for people trying to perform those
operations. That would basically mean they would need to completely
autogenerate all the "field" information at least. We are working on
some APIs to do this for the CLI/webapp, would you be interested in
making rubygem-cobbler autodiscover them and also teaching it to be able
to perform edits?
--Michael