On Tue, 17 Mar 2009 20:46:10 +0100, Jasper Capel <capel(a)stone-it.com>
wrote:
On 03/17/2009 08:42 PM, Michael DeHaan wrote:
> Anyone else have comments? I'm generally amenable to change, but don't
> particularly like the idea of calling it a network
> interface -- the network interface snippets are too complicated as is, I
> don't want to make them more so.
>
+1 on this one, I really don't feel comfortable about having to add
exceptions there, it took a lot of effort to get 'em to where they are
now. :)
-Jasper
_______________________________________________
cobbler-devel mailing list
cobbler-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/cobbler-devel
I agree, I didn't know the power stuff was this generic (I thought it was
much more specific to fencing and generating the cluster configuration), so
using this should be fine with possibly some enhancements as Tom notes for
things like DHCP support for the interface.
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.