On 10/23/2013 10:00 AM, Amit Saha wrote:
Sounds fairly good to me. Are we also looking at *adding* additional
documentation
incrementally over time?
For beah? Maybe - we still have a few bugs for aspects of the harness
that aren't currently well documented.
Also, is there any way someone could independently use Beah outside
of Beaker?
Do we also envision and document such possible use cases in the documentation
of the "related projects" ?
I don't think so (certainly not initially). There are better options
(like autotest or STAF) for Beaker independent test harnesses, and for
beaker-system-scan the intent is to push a lot of the elements of
broader interest down into lshw.
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan
Red Hat Infrastructure Engineering & Development, Brisbane
Testing Solutions Team Lead
Beaker Development Lead (
http://beaker-project.org/)