----- Original Message -----
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Dan Callaghan" <dcallagh(a)redhat.com>
> I'm thinking we should go ahead and do that *before* the lshw port
> of
> the script. It should make it easier to experiment with different
> versions of the inventory code, by substituting a different build
> of
> beaker-inventory.
Sounds like a good idea. So you basically mean, that what we have in
pushInventory.py will
now be beaker-inventory (with/without changes) ?
This sounds like a good plan for Beaker 1.0: split the inventory tool out to a separate
RPM, and then upgrade that to use lshw instead of smolt.
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan
Red Hat Infrastructure Engineering & Development, Brisbane
Python Applications Team Lead
Beaker Development Lead (
http://beaker-project.org/)
PulpDist Development Lead (
http://pulpdist.readthedocs.org)