On Tue, 3 Mar 2020, Steven A. Falco wrote:
On 3/3/20 3:12 PM, Paul Whalen wrote:
>
> Hi Steve,
>
>> I just tried Fedora-Minimal-Rawhide-20200302.n.1.aarch64.raw.xz and it
>> worked
>> properly. However,
>> Fedora-Workstation-Rawhide-20200302.n.1.aarch64.raw.xz
>> has a problem, as shown by the attached session.log file. I let it run
>> for
>> a long period of time, and after 5 or 10 minutes it wound up at a dracut
>> emergency prompt. Please note that this was a fresh install - the only
>> thing I changed was to enable the console uart in config.txt so I could
>> log
>> the output.
>
> We're a few weeks out from Fedora 32 Beta, so Rawhide is getting very
> little
> attention right now. Both of these are pre-release as well, so issues are
> somewhat expected until GA.
>
> The last nominated nightly was 20200225.n.0, I tested both Minimal and
> Workstation images for AArch64 and they should boot as expected.
Thanks Paul. I just tried Fedora-Workstation-32-20200225.n.0.aarch64.raw.xz
on my RPi4 but it behaves the same as I previously reported. There is a 5
minute pause after the eth0 link becomes ready and I then wind up in the
dracut emergency shell.
No matter - I have a running setup that started out as Rawhide-20200127. I
was just trying a later version to see how it behaved. And I know it isn't
ready for prime-time yet. I pasted the last few console message below for
reference.
I saw this when I updated my rpi4 and tried booting with
kernel-5.5.0-0.rc6.git3.1.fc32.aarch64
I did a bit of debugging and it looked like dracut didn't load
the right modules to see the SD card.
Michael Young