Am 05.12.18 um 00:45 schrieb Peter Robinson:
>>>> On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 5:17 PM Robert Moskowitz <
>>>> rgm(a)htt-consult.com> wrote:
>>>>> Additional bug? in F28 x64 installer:
>>>>>
>>>>> # fedora-arm-image-installer --image=/home/rgm/arm/Fedora-
>>>>> Minimal-armhfp-Rawhide-20181203.n.0-sda.raw.xz --supported --
>>>>> media=/dev/sdb
>>>>> cat: /usr/share/doc/fedora-arm-installer//SUPPORTED-BOARDS: No
>>>>> such file or directory
>>>>>
>>>>> The installer looks at what my system lists as supported boards,
>>>>> rather than what the image shows and why the double
>>>> You need to update to the latest version.
>>>>
>>> Yeah,,,
>>>
>>> I had tried a 'dnf update fedora-arm*' and got nothing to update.
>>>
>>> Had problems with the system so did a general dnf update to get the
>>> latest stuff before rebooting and now it works.
>>>
>>> So my bad on trying a shortcut to update fedora-arm-image-
>>> installer....
>>>
>>> No odroid listed, so it is do it the long way, it seems.
>> The odroid boards need binary files we can not distribute. While I have
>> a couple they are not really supportable.
> So this confirms it is the long way and no shortcuts forthcoming.
>
> OK. I will deal with it. It does look to be one of the better boards
> out there right now. But will see if I can get it to boot as I would
> like...
The Odroid boards are OK, but we don't have any engagement with them
so they're a best effort and they do occasionally break. The Odroid
people don't tend to do anything upstream and they have a signed SPL
(Secondary Process Loader) which means we can't produce working U-Boot
binaries due to the bits that Dennis mentions above. They really are a
community supported best effort, I personally prefer to engage and
actively support devices where the companies work with the upstream
communities to support their devices.
Peter
_______________________________________________
Peter: you're right. But on the other hand, there is no other SBC with
this power (Hexacore, USB3,SATA,...)
Andreas