On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 3:43 AM William Brown <william(a)blackhats.net.au> wrote:
Hey all,
RC images have been pushed:
https://hub.docker.com/r/389ds/dirsrv
First, I'm not with processes on Docker Hub, so please bear with me...
:) I don't see a Dockerfile tab on the page -- is this because of how
the OSB container pipeline works? (hint: I usually don't trust the
builds on the Docker Hub for which there is not a Dockerfile)
I'll try to accomodate as much feedback as possible, aiming for 1.4.2 to be out first
fully supported release. Sounds okay?
> On 29 Aug 2019, at 12:55, William Brown <william(a)blackhats.net.au> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I've been wanting this for a long time and I think we're almost there -
I'd like us to start offering docker images of 389 Directory Server as part of our
upstream release process.
>
> I have discussed this with Mark already and we both think we are reasonably happy
with the idea and the state we're in.
>
> -- The Technical Process and Details:
>
> As there is significant interest within SUSE for containerised 389, as well as open
tooling as part of
build.opensuse.org, the current proposed process is:
>
> Source Release -> OBS:network:ldap -> OBS:389-ds-container -> docker hub
>
> Because this pipeline is automated between source to the container, and this is
already part of my responsibility as the SUSE package manager, it's a small amount of
effort to then mirror the container to docker hub.
>
> I have already established an organisation on docker hub, and will be giving Mark
access to be able to manage this as well.
>
>
https://cloud.docker.com/u/389ds/repository/list
>
> Initially we'll name the image as:
>
> 389ds/dirsrv:1.4.rc
>
> Once we are happy with the process, and have received some community feedback
we'll move to:
>
> 389ds/dirsrv:1.4.1
> 389ds/dirsrv:1.4.2
> 389ds/dirsrv:1.4 # points to latest 1.4.X
> 389ds/dirsrv:latest # points to newest version
>
> We would of course encourage people to use the "latest" tag.
>
> -- Support
>
> During the rc phase we would announce that the container support is "best
effort" and we'll obviously work to resolve issues, but it's not suitable for
production work loads.
>
> Once we are happy with this for a few releases, we'll move to the same support
levels as our normal releases - best effort community, and patch backporting as we
normally do. For official support, contact a vendor like SUSE or Red Hat.
>
> -- Future / Downstreams
>
> The design of the container integration is such that we should be able to easily
swap the suse/fedora/rhel as the base image, so downstreams should be able to easily adopt
the dscontainer tool and have customers pivot from the upstream image to their vendor
image quite easily.
>
> A future container option is to supply a tools container that has a shell + ds*
tools, so that you can have a work flow such as:
>
> docker run -v 389ds:/data 389ds/dirsrv:latest
> docker run -i -t -v 389ds:/data 389ds/tools:latest
> # shell inside of the tools container
> # dsconf ....
>
> -- Testing today:
>
> To test the image as it exists today:
>
> docker pull
registry.opensuse.org/home/firstyear/containers/389-ds-container:latest
>
>
> Thoughts and feedback?
>
> If there are no objects, I'll push the rc to docker hub early next week (2nd or
3rd of Sep)
>
> --
> Sincerely,
>
> William
> _______________________________________________
> 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-devel@lists.fedoraproje...
--
Sincerely,
William
_______________________________________________
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-devel@lists.fedoraproje...