389-devel May 2007

389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

7 participants
10 discussions

[Fedora-directory-devel] Please review: Bug #239765: Allow mimimum schema in ds_newinst.pl
by Andrew Bartlett 27 May '07

27 May '07

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239765 Resolves: bug #239765 Bug Description: Allow mimimum schema in ds_newinst.pl Reviewed by: ??? Files:https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=155069 Branch: HEAD Fix Description: Patch to add an option for installing partial/full schema This patch implements a new configuration option [slapd] install_full_schema= 1 Setting this to 0 will only install 00core.ldif Platforms tested: Fedora Core 5 (with Samba4 as testing client) Flag Day: no Doc impact: yes - wiki on install inf settings needs update Thanks, Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/ Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org Samba Developer, Red Hat Inc. http://redhat.com

3 4

[Fedora-directory-devel] cleaning up FILE_PATHSEP?
by Andrew Bartlett 23 May '07

23 May '07

I recently began work on bug 239765, and came across the wonder of FILE_PATHSEP: #ifdef XP_UNIX #define FILE_PATHSEP '/' #define FILE_PATHSEPP "/" #define FILE_PARENT "../" #define WSACleanup() #elif defined(XP_WIN32) #define FILE_PATHSEP '/' #define FILE_PATHSEPP "\\\\" #define FILE_PARENT "..\\" #endif /* XP_WIN32 */ Firstly, what little I knew about windows file handling told me that we could, at least on the supply side, use a unix /. Indeed, I noted that much of create_instance does exactly that *and* passes in FILE_PATHSEP via %c. If we needed FILE_PATHSEP, then this would already be a problem: /* generate <confdir>/slapd-collations.conf */ PR_snprintf(src, sizeof(src), "%s%c%s%c/config/%s-collations.conf", cf->sysconfdir, FILE_PATHSEP, cf->package_name, FILE_PATHSEP, PRODUCT_NAME); PR_snprintf(dest, sizeof(dest), "%s%c%s-collations.conf", cf->config_dir, FILE_PATHSEP, PRODUCT_NAME); Even more priceless is the use of FILE_PATHSEP in ldap/admin/src/configure_instance.cpp:create_console_script(). (is there a /bin/sh that doesn't accept / as a path?). Anyway, for my own amusement, I'll post a patch (probably untested on win32) to make this a little easier on the eyes, and perhaps even easier on new programmers to the codebase. Thoughts? Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/ Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org Samba Developer, Red Hat Inc. http://redhat.com

3 5

[Fedora-directory-devel] shadowLastChange not updating
by Brian Martinez 23 May '07

23 May '07

All, My system is suffering from shadowLastChange not updating on the FDS server when a user updates their password from the unix command-line. Anyone ever seen this behavior and have a fix? Respectfully, Brian _________________________________________________________________ Change is good. See what’s different about Windows Live Hotmail. http://www.windowslive-hotmail.com/learnmore/default.html?locale=en-us&ocid…

1 0

[Fedora-directory-devel] Please review: Bug #239764: bitwise plugin for FDS
by Andrew Bartlett 14 May '07

14 May '07

(I hope I'm getting this right...) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239764 Resolves: bug #239764 Bug Description: bitwise plugin for FDS Reviewed by: nhosoi Files: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=154518&action=view Branch: HEAD Fix Description: Implement bitwise extended match operations, as required by Samba4 (to match AD expectations). Platforms tested: Fedora Core 5/6 (with Samba4 as testing client) Flag Day: no Doc impact: no Many thanks to Pete for digging up this plugin interface and example in the first place, and to Rich for cleaning my plugin up into a working state. Thanks, Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/ Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org Samba Developer, Red Hat Inc. http://redhat.com

1 0

[Fedora-directory-devel] [PATCH] Allow replication in 00core.ldif
by Andrew Bartlett 11 May '07

11 May '07

I've been playing with Fedora DS replication and Samba, and have been making good progress. See http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4/LDAP_Backend/Fedora_DS for the evolving set of instructions (should get better over the next week). I need this patch applied (and possibly the bitwise patch too) to get the replication working. I also had to hack up mmr.pl to take a port, and not assume 389 Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/ Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org Samba Developer, Red Hat Inc. http://redhat.com

2 3

[Fedora-directory-devel] Can we have 'devel' and 1.1beta versions in bugzilla?
by Andrew Bartlett 10 May '07

10 May '07

I seem to have to file bugs against 1.0.x versions of Fedora DS, when they apply to current CVS. There isn't a great flood of bugs, but perhaps someone with appropriate rights add some versions. Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/ Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org Samba Developer, Red Hat Inc. http://redhat.com

2 1

[Fedora-directory-devel] [Fedora Directory Server] Replacing an attributeTypes in cn: schema
by Eugenia Candida Oliveira de Moura 10 May '07

10 May '07

Hi, I need to make a replace of one objectClasses in schema, but he is giving error trying to add ldif below: dn: cn=schema changetype: modify replace: objectclasses objectclasses: (2.16.840.1.113730.3.2.10006 "objectoTeste" NAME DESC "first test" SUP top MUST cn MAY) Error: ldap_modify: additional info: objectClasses: Replace is not allowed on the subschema subentry How correct this error? Replace in an objectClasses of cn:schema is possivel really to make one. Thanks, Eugênia.

2 2

[Fedora-directory-devel] SELinux and directory server
by Karl MacMillan 09 May '07

09 May '07

The page http://directory.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Install_Guide suggests putting selinux into permissive mode. Why? I've not seen any problems running the directory server under enforcing (either fedora-ds-base from extras or the full install). It's not a great idea for on Fedora security technology to suggest disabling another . . . Karl

3 4

[Fedora-directory-devel] Please review: Bug 239494: setuputil: use adm.conf instead of dbswitch.conf, ldap.conf, etc
by Rich Megginson 08 May '07

08 May '07

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239494 Resolves: bug 239494 Bug Description: setuputil: use adm.conf instead of dbswitch.conf, ldap.conf, etc Reviewed by: ??? Files: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=154360 Branch: HEAD Fix Description: Just use adm.conf for the information we used to get from dbswitch.conf, ldap.conf, and so on. We will need to change admin server installation to update the correct information in those files. I also changed many of the functions that accept a server root parameter to accept instead the full path of the directory containing the configuration file. Platforms tested: RHEL4 Flag Day: no Doc impact: Yes. We will have to doc that those other files are no longer used. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=154361&action=diff

1 0

[Fedora-directory-devel] Please review: Bug 239475: adminutil: Several admin server related bugs
by Rich Megginson 08 May '07

08 May '07

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239475 Resolves: bug 239475 Bug Description: adminutil: Several admin server related bugs Reviewed by: ??? Files: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=154347 Branch: HEAD Fix Description: 1) Create non-ssl and ssl function to find the SIE DN given the SIE ID. Change pset code to use these new functions 2) Change the ADMSSL_Init* routines to accept a force parameter. If this parameter is true, force NSS_Initialize even if the adminutil is not configured for SSL. Changed code that uses ADMSSL_Init* to use this new parameter. 3) The pset node removal code needed to set the node->left or ->right to NULL only after freeing it. Fortunately this function is hardly used at all. 4) free memory after use 5) Make sure the buffer is correctly null terminated. Also, clean up a small memory leak. 6) Fixed memory leaks. Platforms tested: RHEL4 Flag Day: no Doc impact: no https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=154348&action=diff

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

389-devel May 2007