On 09.06.2015 15:28, poma wrote:
> On 09.06.2015 13:39, poma wrote:
>> On 08.06.2015 16:25, poma wrote:
>>> On 08.06.2015 16:23, poma wrote:
>>>> On 03.06.2015 08:13, poma wrote:
>>>>> On 01.06.2015 09:15, poma wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Failed to mount /sysroot" occurs with recent Rawhide
Live images.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Currently tested with:
>>>>>> Fedora-Live-Xfce-x86_64-rawhide-20150531.iso
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Fedora-Live-Xfce-x86_64-rawhide-20150602.iso
>>>>> Failed to mount /sysroot
>>>>>
>>>>> Is there a report on the bootability of these images?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Fedora-Live-Xfce-x86_64-rawhide-20150608.iso
>>>> Failed to mount /sysroot
>>>>
>>>> 220-x are all broken in this sense - Failed to mount /sysroot
>>>> - systemd-220-5.fc23
>>>> - systemd-220-3.fc23
>>>> - systemd-220-2.fc23
>>>> - systemd-220-1.fc23
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Last "bootable" is systemd-219-15.fc23 - as part of
>>> - Test compilation:
>>>
http://goo.gl/Gm4ffO
>>> ISO/Rawhide-Live-Xfce.iso
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> Failed to mount /sysroot
>>
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90913
>>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1229665
>>
>>
>
>
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90913#c5
> From mezcalero:
> <quote>
> Well, this is the mount tool saying that it doesn't known the "nfs"
file system type. That might have a number of different reasons, such as mount.nfs or the
kernel nfs modules missing from the initrd or the kernel in general. Either way it's
unlikely to be a systemd issue. Please ask the initrd, util-linux or kernel maintainers
for help on this.
> </quote>
>
> Guys, please comment on that so I can change to related component.
>
>
Maybe
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/systemd.git/commit/?id=6cfa04faa1beb87...
in combination with dracut not including 60-block.rules
Actually, no... it tries:
sysroot.mount: About to execute: /usr/bin/mount live:CDLABEL=LiveCD /sysroot -n
-o rw