On 09.06.2015 15:45, Harald Hoyer wrote:
> On 09.06.2015 15:28, poma wrote:
>> On 09.06.2015 13:39, poma wrote:
>>> On 08.06.2015 16:25, poma wrote:
>>>> On 08.06.2015 16:23, poma wrote:
>>>>> On 03.06.2015 08:13, poma wrote:
>>>>>> On 01.06.2015 09:15, poma wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Failed to mount /sysroot" occurs with recent
Rawhide Live images.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Currently tested with:
>>>>>>> Fedora-Live-Xfce-x86_64-rawhide-20150531.iso
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Fedora-Live-Xfce-x86_64-rawhide-20150602.iso
>>>>>> Failed to mount /sysroot
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is there a report on the bootability of these images?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Fedora-Live-Xfce-x86_64-rawhide-20150608.iso
>>>>> Failed to mount /sysroot
>>>>>
>>>>> 220-x are all broken in this sense - Failed to mount /sysroot
>>>>> - systemd-220-5.fc23
>>>>> - systemd-220-3.fc23
>>>>> - systemd-220-2.fc23
>>>>> - systemd-220-1.fc23
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Last "bootable" is systemd-219-15.fc23 - as part of
>>>> - Test compilation:
>>>>
http://goo.gl/Gm4ffO
>>>> ISO/Rawhide-Live-Xfce.iso
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Failed to mount /sysroot
>>>
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90913
>>>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1229665
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90913#c5
>> From mezcalero:
>> <quote>
>> Well, this is the mount tool saying that it doesn't known the "nfs"
file system type. That might have a number of different reasons, such as mount.nfs or the
kernel nfs modules missing from the initrd or the kernel in general. Either way it's
unlikely to be a systemd issue. Please ask the initrd, util-linux or kernel maintainers
for help on this.
>> </quote>
>>
>> Guys, please comment on that so I can change to related component.
>>
>>
>
> Maybe
>
>
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/systemd.git/commit/?id=6cfa04faa1beb87...
>
> in combination with dracut not including 60-block.rules
>
Actually, no... it tries:
sysroot.mount: About to execute: /usr/bin/mount live:CDLABEL=LiveCD /sysroot -n
-o rw