In the wake of the BZ 1924808 discussion in Thursday's Go/No-Go
meeting, I am proposing an addition to the Basic Release
Criteria. This would go into Post-Install Requirements -> Expected
installed system boot behavior -> First boot utilities (appended after
the existing sentence):
> If a utility for creating user accounts and other configuration is configured to launch, it must be visible within 10 seconds of the first boot reaching the launch point.
Why 10 seconds? Why not? That sort of feels like the maximum length of
time someone could reasonably be expected to wait. A shorter time
might be better.
I don't particularly love the wording here, but I wanted to make it
clear that it's not 10 seconds from power on, but 10 seconds from the
time the boot up reaches the state where we expect gnome-initial-setup
or its counterparts to appear.
He / Him / His
Senior Program Manager, Fedora & CentOS Stream
Hello friends of Fedora,
I would like to propose a new release covering criterion that was suggested
on the yesterday's Blocker Review Meeting. Please let me know, what you
think about it and perhaps suggest improvements.
*Proposal 1 (conservative criterion)*
*On computers with dual video cards (or with external video output) the
system must be able to display the video content on each connected device.
Any release blocking desktop must provide ways to set up various display
modes (mirroring, extension), scaling, resolution, frequency, and
*Proposal 2 (bold criterion)*
*On computers with dual video cards (or with external video output), as
well as with multiple video cards, the system must be able to display the
video content on each connected device. Any release blocking desktop must
provide ways to set up various display modes (mirroring, extension),
scaling, resolution, frequency, and orientation).*
FEDORA QE, RHCE
612 45 Brno - Královo Pole
TRIED AND PERSONALLY TESTED, ERGO TRUSTED. <https://redhat.com/trusted>
I know I'm the one who always runs the old PCs, but I recently decided I
should have one new one in the mix. The one I got has an ASUS Z590-A
motherboard and an Intel i5-10400 processor. Well Fedora won't run a
Wayland session on it. It will only run a Gnome-xorg session. I even
had to run the install from Basic Graphics mode. I asked about it on
AskFedora. I have no useful response yet, but another person wrote about
a similar experience, but different motherboard; the processor was
different, but the same gen and also a UHD type. This needs to be
addressed as all the Intel processors have been UHD for quite a while
now. I'm thinking I should be writing a bug against mutter. Please let
me know if you think I've got something wrong.
Have a Great Day!
My alias is TheEvilSkeleton, but you can also call me Tesk,
TheEvilSkely, Skelly, Proprietary Chrome-chan or anything close to it.
I'm really excited to be part of QA! I first tried GNU/Linux 3 years
ago, from Ubuntu to Manjaro, Arch, Gentoo, Pop!_OS, etc. and finally
Fedora Silverblue, and I started using it as my daily OS since then.
Personally, I don't think I have much experience with Linux, since I
have been using it for around three years. I do think that I have more
knowledge in such topic than an average Linux user, but not as much as
say, a system administrator. I try my best to learn as much as I can so
I can contribute back what I've learned. I mostly contribute to
documentation, since it's one of the places where free and open source
software (FOSS) falls behind, but also because it's where I am very
good at. I also experiment; I play around a lot with distributions,
containers, VMs and more, hence me trying out many Linux distributions
in the past. I often break stuff because, well, I play around things a
lot and I'm very experimental.
I also have some knowledge with Flatpak. I maintain 6 Flatpak packages
currently. I am currently writing an introduction to Flatpak for those
that have little knowledge in Flatpak and want to learn its technical
side. I've been working for around a month, and I've spent plenty of
days for research, so I hope I'm going to give a very accurate and
user-friendly introduction to beginners. With that knowledge, I'm going
to take advantage of it to contribute to Flatpak's documentation.
On a more personal note, I'm a 19 year old "student". I'm quoting
"student", since I stopped attending to classes because I couldn't
concentrate anymore due to stress and heavy pressure from college
because of COVID. Instead of doing nothing during the time, I decided
to join QA to contribute more to FOSS and collaborating with people
around the world, and be part of the Year of the Linux Desktop™. I'm
a male, but you are free to use the pronoun you desire.
Thank you so much for accepting me in the project! I'm really excited
for this. Fedora is very open for contributions and is transparent,
which is the type of project I love.
If you want to contact me:
My nick is TheEvilSkeleton at irc.freenode.chat ;My Matrix user is
Have a nice day everyone, and thank you again for accepting me!
Hello, I have an HP TouchSmart tx2 Notebook PC. I'm running Fedora 34, with
Gnome running Wayland, and I can't get the gestures to work.
Well, not just the gestures, but the multi-touch feature itself on my
touchpad. It could be a hardware limitation, but I don't think that it is.
Any feedback would be helpful.
we have updated the main Python from 3.8.7 to 3.8.8 in Fedora 32, but since this
never went trough rawhide or Fedora 33 (already at 3.9), I wanted it to receive
some karma before pushing the update.
However, after 14 days, it only gained +2.
If you run Fedora 32, please update Python from updates-testing and after a few
days, report back via karma if your system is fully functional. Thanks.
I'm very glad to join the team. I'm a newbie to open source and have always
wanted to make contributions.
My name is Okwuidegbe Emmanuel. I live in Lagos, Nigeria. I love working
but very excited and willing to learn more about the project and contribute
to the #fedora-qa team.
This mail is addressed to Outreachy applicants interested in contributing
or already contributing to Fedora QA Dashboard.
Due to public holiday in Czech Republic mentors will not be available in
* lbrabec: Apr 1 - Apr 5
* jskladan: Apr 2 - Apr 5
I tried to upgrade from fc33 to fc34 BETA by usage of dnf system-upgrade
which I did successfully
for the last 4 or 5 fedora versions by the usage of that dnf plugin. But
for fc33, I was not successful:
The finalizing command "sudo dnf system-upgrade reboot" did a reboot,
but without the installaton
of the by the dnf command "sudo dnf system-upgrade download
--releasever=34" downloaded pkgs.
My last fc33 kernel is 5.11.11.
Did I forget some required action[s]?
Any help is appreciated.
Fedora release 33 (Thirty Three)
Joachim Backes <joachim.backes(a)rhrk.uni-kl.de>