-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
the fedora 19 schedule[1] states that spins freeze was March 12, I have yet tp see the spins identified for fedora 19. At this point I am inclined to go with the 5 stand desktop spins only through the entire f19 cycle. Things need to get moving and quickly if we are to do anything else.
Dennis
[1] http://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-19/f-19-devel-tasks.html
On 2 Apr 2013 03:55, "Dennis Gilmore" dennis@ausil.us wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
the fedora 19 schedule[1] states that spins freeze was March 12, I have yet tp see the spins identified for fedora 19. At this point I am inclined to go with the 5 stand desktop spins only through the entire f19 cycle. Things need to get moving and quickly if we are to do anything else.
There was at least one that didn't make F18 that I'm pretty sure was approved and I this is even in git.
Peter
Dennis
[1] http://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-19/f-19-devel-tasks.html -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAlFaSJsACgkQkSxm47BaWfdpnACfXR6FN62J2w8qGyZDPXSQqyrz Z/AAoMBQvQn/j1k0291slyHPErXhStuX =Bgv1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ spins mailing list spins@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/spins
Hi,
--- On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 8:25 AM, Dennis Gilmore dennis@ausil.us wrote: | the fedora 19 schedule[1] states that spins freeze was March 12, I have | yet tp see the spins identified for fedora 19. --
Isn't the following page valid for Fedora 19 spins?
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/19/Spins
--- | At this point I am | inclined to go with the 5 stand desktop spins only through the entire | f19 cycle. --
And the other spins will still be built?
SK
On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 12:39:21 +0530, Shakthi Kannan shakthimaan@gmail.com wrote:
Isn't the following page valid for Fedora 19 spins?
That appears to just be a copy of what was intended for f18.
| At this point I am | inclined to go with the 5 stand desktop spins only through the entire | f19 cycle. --
And the other spins will still be built?
I think that is the question.
Though note that we haven't been doing official spins other than the desktops for alpha and beta for the last few releases to ease the job of QA. Other spins are available for review and testing from the nightly composes.
On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 21:55:23 -0500, Dennis Gilmore dennis@ausil.us wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
the fedora 19 schedule[1] states that spins freeze was March 12, I have yet tp see the spins identified for fedora 19. At this point I am inclined to go with the 5 stand desktop spins only through the entire f19 cycle. Things need to get moving and quickly if we are to do anything else.
I might have to drop a couple of games before final from the games spin. But I am going to wait to see if the desktop spin shrinks (it is currently over its target size and the games spin is based on it) before making final decisions on how to get games undersize. (I may switch to using xfce as a base for f20, especially if llvmpipe doesn't get fixed enough to run gnome on old hardware, but it is too late for f19.)
Dennis Gilmore (dennis@ausil.us) said:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
the fedora 19 schedule[1] states that spins freeze was March 12, I have yet tp see the spins identified for fedora 19. At this point I am inclined to go with the 5 stand desktop spins only through the entire f19 cycle. Things need to get moving and quickly if we are to do anything else.
I know that Dan had a MATE spin as part of the feature page that was approved.
Bill
On 04.04.2013 20:58, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Hi all,
the fedora 19 schedule[1] states that spins freeze was March 12, I have yet tp see the spins identified for fedora 19. At this point I am inclined to go with the 5 stand desktop spins only through the entire f19 cycle. Things need to get moving and quickly if we are to do anything else.
oh i was not aware that FSL was excluded from recurring, what - besides to have the working kickstart updated - do i have to do, on the organizational part?
What do you need me to do "quickly" to keep Fedora Security Lab included? change something here? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/19/Spins
and also my last information was to put the spin in the certain Category to keep it this would be
Category:Spins Fedora 19
thanks for the feedback
cu joerg
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 04/04/2013 10:47 PM, Joerg Simon wrote:
On 04.04.2013 20:58, Bill Nottingham wrote:
the fedora 19 schedule[1] states that spins freeze was March 12, I have yet tp see the spins identified for fedora 19. At this point I am inclined to go with the 5 stand desktop spins only through the entire f19 cycle. Things need to get moving and quickly if we are to do anything else.
oh i was not aware that FSL was excluded from recurring, what - besides to have the working kickstart updated - do i have to do, on the organizational part?
What do we have to do to bring the Fedora Security Lab back for F19? Any chance?
Kind regards,
Fabian
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 8:56 AM, Fabian Affolter fab@fedoraproject.orgwrote:
What do we have to do to bring the Fedora Security Lab back for F19? Any chance?
It seems that the Robotics spin is in the same boat (not listed as recurring in [1].) Does this indicate that we need to seek re-approval for the spins each release, or does recurring mean something else?
Rich
On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 10:21:01 -0400, Rich Mattes richmattes@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 8:56 AM, Fabian Affolter fab@fedoraproject.orgwrote:
What do we have to do to bring the Fedora Security Lab back for F19? Any chance?
It seems that the Robotics spin is in the same boat (not listed as recurring in [1].) Does this indicate that we need to seek re-approval for the spins each release, or does recurring mean something else?
The old list was just copied and I believe that was the first one Robotics was on. It really should be recurring now.