adamwill commented on the pull-request: `osbuild: build workstation` that you are
following:
``
well, that's a problem, because that's not what that type is meant for, as I said.
that type is intended to signify a traditional DVD installer - the Server DVD, or the old
Everything DVD we no longer make.
IoT composes do look weird, now I look at them, because they have these two images:
{
"arch": "x86_64",
"bootable": true,
"checksums": {
"sha256":
"6c2c96fa9430e20c93cb600660f35461cf17ba23f2c7da30e5a7c902459fb18c"
},
"disc_count": 1,
"disc_number": 1,
"format": "iso",
"implant_md5":
"cc67ff36b9613545c4dc58355a8ac5ef",
"mtime": 1690895814,
"path":
"IoT/x86_64/iso/Fedora-IoT-ostree-x86_64-39-20230801.0.iso",
"size": 1336844288,
"subvariant": "IoT",
"type": "dvd-ostree",
"volume_id": "Fedora-iot-ostree-x86_64-39"
}
and
{
"arch": "x86_64",
"bootable": false,
"checksums": {
"sha256":
"5a002c2bdb0eb7269ab507eacc272c99d3142a74708aa0565612d787827da44f"
},
"disc_count": 1,
"disc_number": 1,
"format": "iso",
"implant_md5": null,
"mtime": 1690896711,
"path":
"IoT/x86_64/iso/Fedora-IoT-ostree-39.20230801.0-20230801.0.x86_64.iso",
"size": 2411200512,
"subvariant": "IoT",
"type": "dvd",
"volume_id": null
},
the first is the 'normal' IoT installer image, note the type `dvd-ostree`, which
is the correct type for this kind of image. Are you saying the second is a similar image
but built by osbuild? If so, that's not really what its metadata is identifying it as,
which is kind of an issue. We probably need to work this out so we have something
consistent and usable.
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/1190