On 01/08/2016 11:27 AM, bugzilla(a)redhat.com wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294904
Antonio Trande <anto.trande(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #12 from Antonio Trande <anto.trande(a)gmail.com> ---
Package approved.
I still have heard nothing from the main python maintainers, and I'd like to
get some kind of an ack for the following plan:
- Dropping the python3-pkgversion-macros package, replaced with
python-srpm-macros from above and required by redhat-rpm-config (in Fedora)
and epel-rpm-macros (in EPEL).
- Dropping the python-macros sub-package from python, replace by Requires:
python-rpm-macros from above package. python3 requires this as well.
- Dropping macros.python2 from python-devel, replaced with Requires:
python2-rpm-macros from above package.
- Dropping macros.python3 from python3-devel, replaced with Requires:
python3-rpm-macros from above package.
This achieves the goal of decoupling modifying/updating the python macros from
updating the main python package, which has become a serious hindrance to
developing new python rpm macros.
The reviewed package contains the Fedora macros. macros will be changed on
the EPEL branches.
I've requested a side tag to do the build in here -
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6331
as I think the timing is tricky and the possibility of breaking the buildroot
moderate.
--
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222
NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane orion(a)nwra.com
Boulder, CO 80301
http://www.nwra.com