most of the packages I've seen lack the python3_other bits (no
statistics, just my impression).
That's my impression too.
Is this something we want? If so, are the packagers willing to adapt
their packages (as much as I'd like to do this, I lack the resources to
hack on 228 packages)?
I've done quite a few but it's in the tens, not the hundreds. However, winter is
coming and it's a nice activity when you're down with the flu.
I've noticed that the with_python3_other variable isn't defined in the file
shipped by python3-rpm-macros, it would help transition to set that variable as in the
original plan. The edits I've done use that variable as a conditional. Or
shouldn't they?
I'm interesting in having more python3.6 packages in EPEL7 since newer releases of
Mailman3 requires Python >= 3.5, so I'm currently stuck by some missing
dependencies. So I'm willing to help move this forward.
Aurélien