Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=887913
--- Comment #6 from Petr Pisar <ppisar(a)redhat.com> ---
(In reply to comment #4)
I have a question about full versioning clipper (polyclipping)
dependency.
Math::Clipper version 1.16 comes with clipper 4.10.0. Should I require
exactly this version of polyclipping-devel and libpolyclipping.so.3?
I do not need to specify run-time dependency on libpolyclipping.so.3. It should
get discovered by rpmbuild automatically.
You need to build-require specific version of polyclipping-devel only if it's
required due to incompatibilities. I think it's not necessary in this case as
the polyclipping does not change ABI frequently. However I would recommend to
build-require minimal version equalled to bundled version because users can
imply Clipper version from Math::Clipper. I.e. polyclipping-devel >= 4.10.0 for
this perl-Clipper-Math release.
If so, should I modify the spec for F17 and F18, as they are using
older
versions, to use older version of this Perl module too?
You should be consistent across Fedora releases, thus if you decide to tie the
two versions, you should either not package Perl module into older Fedoras, or
upgrade polyclipping, or package older Perl modules. That's up to you.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=x6MyG3mTLF&a=cc_unsubscribe