Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: ghc-bloomfilter - A fast, space efficient Bloom filter implementation
Alias: ghc-bloomfilter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670007
Summary: Review Request: ghc-bloomfilter - A fast, space
efficient Bloom filter implementation
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com,
fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
SPEC file URL : http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/ghc-bloomfilter.spec
SRPM URL :
http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/ghc-bloomfilter-1.2.6.7-1.f13.src.rpm
rpmlint output:
rpmlint -i ghc-bloomfilter-*fc14*.rpm ../ghc-bloomfilter.spec
ghc-bloomfilter-prof.i686: E: devel-dependency ghc-bloomfilter-devel
Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package
itself.
ghc-bloomfilter-prof.i686: W: no-documentation
The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include
documentation files.
ghc-bloomfilter-prof.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib/ghc-6.12.3/bloomfilter-1.2.6.7/libHSbloomfilter-1.2.6.7_p.a
A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If
you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a
development package.
4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: rubygem-mustache - Mustache is a framework-agnostic way to render logic-free views
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=644335
Summary: Review Request: rubygem-mustache - Mustache is a
framework-agnostic way to render logic-free views
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: jzigmund(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Spec URL: http://st.fri.uniza.sk/~zigmundj/fedorapkg/rubygem-mustache.spec
SRPM URL:
http://st.fri.uniza.sk/~zigmundj/fedorapkg/rubygem-mustache-0.11.2-1.fc13.s…
Description:
Think of Mustache as a replacement for your views.
Instead of views consisting of ERB or HAML with random helpers and arbitrary
logic, your views are broken into two parts: a Ruby class and an HTML template.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: rubygem-passenger - Passenger Ruby on Rails deployment system
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470696
Summary: Review Request: rubygem-passenger - Passenger Ruby on
Rails deployment system
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: kanarip(a)kanarip.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Spec URL: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/rubygem-passenger.spec
SRPM URL:
http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f9/SRPMS/rubygem-passenger-2.0.3-1.fc9.src.rpm
Description: Phusion Passenger is a deployment system for Ruby on Rails
applications on Apache, i.e. a 'mod_rails'. Rails deployment becomes an "upload
& done" process.
rpmlint output:
[jmeeuwen@ghandalf packages]$ rpmlint
~/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/rubygem-passenger-*
~/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/mod_passenger-2.0.3-1.fc9.x86_64.rpm
rubygem-passenger.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/bin/passenger-config
rubygem-passenger-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
rubygem-passenger-doc.x86_64: W: no-documentation
mod_passenger.x86_64: W: no-documentation
koji scratch builds fail atm. because of a required rubygem-fastthread
update/upgrade (built and pushed already) and a missing required package
rubygem-rack (See #470694)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: git-annex - Manage files with git, without checking their contents in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=662259
Summary: Review Request: git-annex - Manage files with git,
without checking their contents in
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: mathstuf(a)gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Spec URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/git-annex/git-annex.spec
SRPM URL:
http://benboeckel.net/packaging/git-annex/git-annex-0.11-1.fc14.src.rpm
Description:
git-annex allows managing files with git, without checking the file contents
into git. While that may seem paradoxical, it is useful when dealing with files
larger than git can currently easily handle, whether due to limitations in
memory, checksumming time, or disk space.
Even without file content tracking, being able to manage files with git, move
files around and delete files with versioned directory trees, and use branches
and distributed clones, are all very handy reasons to use git. And annexed
files can co-exist in the same git repository with regularly versioned files,
which is convenient for maintaining documents, Makefiles, etc that are
associated with annexed files but that benefit from full revision control.
When a file is annexed, its content is moved into a key-value store, and a
symlink is made that points to the content. These symlinks are checked into git
and versioned like regular files. You can move them around, delete them, and so
on. Pushing to another git repository will make git-annex there aware of the
annexed file, and it can be used to retrieve its content from the key-value
store.
% lintmock fedora-14-x86_64
git-annex.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US checksumming -> check
summing, check-summing, checkmating
git-annex.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US versioned -> version ed,
version-ed, version
git-annex.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US symlink -> sym link,
sym-link, symbolic
git-annex.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US symlinks -> sym links,
sym-links, slinks
git-annex.src: W: invalid-url Source0: git-annex-0.11.tar.bz2
git-annex.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US checksumming -> check
summing, check-summing, checkmating
git-annex.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US versioned -> version
ed, version-ed, version
git-annex.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US symlink -> sym link,
sym-link, symbolic
git-annex.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US symlinks -> sym
links, sym-links, slinks
git-annex.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/share/man/man1/git-annex.1.gz
git-annex-debuginfo.x86_64: E: debuginfo-without-sources
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 10 warnings.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: rubygem-anemone - Anemone web-spider framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632919
Summary: Review Request: rubygem-anemone - Anemone web-spider
framework
Product: Fedora
Version: 13
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: rebus(a)seznam.cz
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
SPEC URL: http://rebus.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/rubygem-anemone.spec
SRPM URL:
http://rebus.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/rubygem-anemone-0.5.0-1.fc13.src.rpm
Description:
Anemone is a Ruby library that makes it quick and painless to write programs
that spider a website. It provides a simple DSL for performing actions on every
page of a site, skipping certain URLs, and calculating the shortest path to
a given page on a site.
The multi-threaded design makes Anemone fast. The API makes it simple. And the
expressiveness of Ruby makes it powerful.
Hello,
Please could you review the package rubygem-anemone?
It is needed for package whatweb.
Output from rpmlint:
$ rpmlint rubygem-anemone-0.5.0-1.fc13.src.rpm
rubygem-anemone-0.5.0-1.fc13.noarch.rpm
rubygem-anemone-doc-0.5.0-1.fc13.noarch.rpm
rubygem-anemone.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multi -> mulch,
mufti
rubygem-anemone.src: W: invalid-url Source0:
http://gems.rubyforge.org/gems/anemone-0.5.0.gem <urlopen error timed out>
rubygem-anemone.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multi -> mulch,
mufti
rubygem-anemone.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary anemone
#The rest are false-positive warings about unexpanded macros = urlencoded chars
in filenames
rubygem-anemone-doc.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/anemone-0.5.0/ri/Anemone/PageStore/shortest_paths%21-i.yaml
%21
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 55 warnings.
Koji F13: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2462142
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: rubygem-robots - Simple robots.txt parser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632912
Summary: Review Request: rubygem-robots - Simple robots.txt
parser
Product: Fedora
Version: 13
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: rebus(a)seznam.cz
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
SPEC URL: http://rebus.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/rubygem-robots.spec
SRPM URL:
http://rebus.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/rubygem-robots-0.10.0-1.fc13.src.rpm
Description:
A simple Ruby library to parse robots.txt.
Hello,
Please could you review the package whatweb?
Output from rpmlint:
$ rpmlint rubygem-robots-0.10.0-1.fc13.src.rpm
rubygem-robots-0.10.0-1.fc13.noarch.rpm
#txt is in the reference to the name of the robots.txt file
rubygem-robots.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) txt -> text, ext, tit
rubygem-robots.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US txt -> text, ext,
tit
rubygem-robots.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) txt -> text, ext, tit
rubygem-robots.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US txt -> text,
ext, tit
#% is part urlencoded name of documentation file
rubygem-robots.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/robots-0.10.0/ri/Robots/ParsedRobots/allowed%3f-i.yaml
%3f
rubygem-robots.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/robots-0.10.0/ri/Robots/timeout%3d-c.yaml %3d
rubygem-robots.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/robots-0.10.0/ri/Robots/allowed%3f-i.yaml %3f
#% test scripts are commonly set with only 644 permission
rubygem-robots.noarch: E: non-executable-script
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/robots-0.10.0/test/test_robots.rb 0644L
/usr/bin/env
Koji F13: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2462027
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: whatweb - Web scanner to identify what websites are running
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=587978
Summary: Review Request: whatweb - Web scanner to identify what
websites are running
Product: Fedora
Version: 12
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: rebus(a)seznam.cz
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
SPEC URL: http://rebus.fedorapeople.org/12/SPECS/whatweb.spec
SRPM URL: http://rebus.fedorapeople.org/12/SRPMS/whatweb-0.4.2-1.fc12.src.rpm
Description:
Identify content management systems (CMS), blogging platforms, stats/analytic
packages, JavaScript libraries, servers and more. When you visit a website in
your browser the transaction includes many unseen hints about how the
web-server
is set up and what software is delivering the web-page. Some of these hints are
obvious, ex. “Powered by XYZ” and others are more subtle. WhatWeb recognizes
these hints and reports what it finds.
Hello,
Please could you review the package whatweb?
Output from rpmlint:
$ rpmlint whatweb-0.4.2-1.fc12.noarch.rpm whatweb-0.4.2-1.fc12.src.rpm
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
Koji F12: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2154469
Koji F13: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2154471
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225902
Summary: Merge Review: intltool
Product: Fedora Extras
Version: devel
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: normal
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
QAContact: fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com
CC: mclasen(a)redhat.com
Fedora Merge Review: intltool
http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/intltool/
Initial Owner: mclasen(a)redhat.com
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: pynag - Python Nagios plugin and configuration environment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672205
Summary: Review Request: pynag - Python Nagios plugin and
configuration environment
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: unspecified
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: tommi(a)tommi.org
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Spec URL: http://pynag.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/pynag.spec
SRPM URL: http://pynag.googlecode.com/files/pynag-0.3-1.src.rpm
Description: Python libraries for managing nagios configuration files and
writing python nagios plugins.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: snmptt - SNMPTT (SNMP Trap Translator) is an SNMP trap handler written in Perl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509965
Summary: Review Request: snmptt - SNMPTT (SNMP Trap Translator)
is an SNMP trap handler written in Perl
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: giesen(a)snickers.org
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Spec URL: http://dirtypackets.net/software/rpm/snmptt/snmptt.spec
SRPM URL: http://dirtypackets.net/software/rpm/snmptt/snmptt-1.2-1.src.rpm
Description: SNMPTT (SNMP Trap Translator) is an SNMP trap handler written in
Perl
This is a new package, I am a new packager (this is my third package submitted
for review) and I require a sponsor.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.