[Bug 184530] Review Request: perl-RPM2
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: perl-RPM2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184530
paul(a)city-fan.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO_REPORTER
------- Additional Comments From paul(a)city-fan.org 2006-08-10 13:25 EST -------
Looks like this review is going nowhere, so I'll close it soon unless somebody
has something new to add.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
17 years, 9 months
[Bug 182254] Review Request: SS5
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: SS5
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182254
------- Additional Comments From pertusus(a)free.fr 2006-08-10 11:14 EST -------
(In reply to comment #37)
> - What I have to do when I'll release ss5-3.6.1 ?
Have a look at the beginning of
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/UsingCvsFaq
> - I have some installation on RedHat AS4.0, can I make a branches for RH?
There is no such thing in fedora. AS4.0 should be more or less
compatible with fedora core 3 (and there is somewhere a repo with
fedora extras packages rebuilt for centos4 which should be compatible
with AS4), but inclusion of FC-3 branches isn't possible anymore
as it is legacy since quite a long time.
> - Can I expose Fedora logo on my web site to promote the package?
I think the best information about the logo is to be found here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Logo
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
17 years, 9 months
[Bug 182254] Review Request: SS5
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: SS5
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182254
------- Additional Comments From pertusus(a)free.fr 2006-08-10 11:01 EST -------
(In reply to comment #36)
> cvs tag -c ss5-3_5_9-1
> ERROR: The tag ss5-3_5_9-1 is already applied on a different branch
> ERROR: You can not forcibly move tags between branches
> ss5-3_5_9-1:devel:mricchet:1150827849
It means that you have 2 packages with the exact same tag (name)
in cvs. The usual way to workaround that issue is to add a
dist tag, so that the release looks like
Release: 1%{?dist}
You could also read
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/DistTag
(it covers much more)
After you have added the dist tag, you should be carefull to make
sure that the upgrade path between fedora versions is clean, such
that ss5 on fedora 6 appears newer for rpm than ss5 on fedora 5
which appears newer than ss5 on fc4 and so on.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
17 years, 9 months
[Bug 182254] Review Request: SS5
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: SS5
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182254
------- Additional Comments From matteo.ricchetti(a)libero.it 2006-08-10 08:12 EST -------
News?
Some other questions:
- What I have to do when I'll release ss5-3.6.1 ?
- I have some installation on RedHat AS4.0, can I make a branches for RH?
- Can I expose Fedora logo on my web site to promote the package?
Thanks!
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
17 years, 9 months