[Bug 177105] Review Request: gnomeradio - Graphical FM-Tuner program
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: gnomeradio - Graphical FM-Tuner program
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177105
rpm(a)greysector.net changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |ASSIGNED
------- Additional Comments From rpm(a)greysector.net 2006-08-01 12:49 EST -------
Yes, you're totally right and I'm very sorry about the delay. It won't happen
again. I've just jumped through the hoops of getting an account and pushed my
first approved package (sysconftool). I promise to be more responsive from now on.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
17 years, 4 months
[Bug 184331] Review Request: K-3D - 3D modeling and rendering system
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: K-3D - 3D modeling and rendering system
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184331
------- Additional Comments From denis(a)poolshark.org 2006-08-01 12:02 EST -------
SPEC: http://www.poolshark.org/src/k3d.spec
SRPM: http://www.poolshark.org/src/k3d-0.5.15.0-2.src.rpm
- I cleaned up the %files section a bit, as you requested. The package does
indeed have both libraries in /usr/lib and /usr/lib/k3d (those are plugins).
- For the undefined-non-weak-symbol warnings. I believe this is intentional. See
here: http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2006-July/msg00569.html
Essentially you are getting the warnings because the package dependencies are
not installed. As for the weak linking, I believe it is intentional to allow k3d
libs to link to either libGL.so from Xorg or from Nv***a.
- For the devel vs non-devel. Part of the package can be considered a devel
package, but I dont think it does what a traditional devel package would do. The
reasons has to do with what K-3D does: it's merely a modeler, the first step
before calling the main rendering engine (e.g. aqsis, which I'll try to package
next), and that step involves using the devel-type files. So the devel files are
required by the main package. This is explicitely mentioned in the project page
at http://www.k-3d.org/wiki/GettingStarted , as well as in comment #1 above. I
brought up the issue on a fedora mailing list a while ago, but I can't seem to
track it down in the archives. I remember the consensus was that it made little
sense to split a package if both parts require each other. OTOH I can't say I
have a strong opinion on the matter...
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
17 years, 4 months
[Bug 187318] Review Request: mondo
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: mondo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187318
------- Additional Comments From dennis(a)ausil.us 2006-07-31 22:27 EST -------
Are you stillintrested in getting this package in Fedora Extras? If so
please review the packaging guidelines. and ensure that your package meets
them.
Please note that you can not use your existing build system with the extras
package. It must meet the fedora guidelines and live in fedora extras cvs.
you can keep a copy in your local svn tree but your package must meet fedora
guidelines always.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
17 years, 4 months
[Bug 180092] Review Request: NRPE - Monitoring agent for Nagios
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: NRPE - Monitoring agent for Nagios
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=180092
------- Additional Comments From jpo(a)di.uminho.pt 2006-07-31 21:15 EST -------
Mike,
I've found two more problems:
* missing build requirement: tcp_wrappers
configure output
----------------
...
checking for socket in -lsocket... no
checking for main in -lwrap... yes
checking for strdup... yes
...
nrpe linking
------------
gcc ... -o nrpe nrpe.c utils.c -L/usr/lib -lssl -lcrypto -lnsl -lwrap
* package nagios-plugins-nrpe shouldn't own
/usr/lib/nagios
/usr/lib/nagios/plugins
as they are owned by the nagios-plugins package (which is listed as a
requirement)
$ rpm -qf /usr/lib/nagios
nagios-plugins-1.4.3-14.fc5
$ rpm -qf /usr/lib/nagios/plugins
nagios-plugins-1.4.3-14.fc5
jpo
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
17 years, 4 months