[Bug 182320] Review Request: gnome-build
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: gnome-build
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182320
------- Additional Comments From paul(a)city-fan.org 2006-08-15 05:14 EST -------
(In reply to comment #28)
> The package itself creates perl(GBF::Make). It looks like I'll need to
> explicitly include that it provides perl(GBF::Make).
I think you should filter out the perl(GBF::Make) dependency, as you've done
with the others. This is because the perl modules provided by and used by this
package are not in the standard perl module install directories, which means
that no other packages will be able to use these perl modules unless they know
exactly where to look for them.
I'd check to ensure that no perl Provides: have slipped through as well.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
17 years, 9 months
[Bug 175047] Review Request: NetworkManager-openvpn
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: NetworkManager-openvpn
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175047
------- Additional Comments From tim(a)niemueller.de 2006-08-15 05:12 EST -------
Created an attachment (id=134200)
--> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=134200&action=view)
Log of connection with SELinux openvpn policy module
It seems that it does not work. I'm using the targeted policy in permissive
mode (it just does not work with enforcing, so many simple little details fail,
coding is a hassle with selinux enabled etc.).
See the dmesg log for the problems. It seems that the management connection
(local TCP socket) is not allowed and access to the user's certificate files is
denied (it's in the user home directory somewhere probably), also there seems
to be a problem with the dbus communication.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
17 years, 9 months
[Bug 181997] Review Request: gpc - The GNU Pascal compiler
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: gpc - The GNU Pascal compiler
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181997
------- Additional Comments From tibbs(a)math.uh.edu 2006-08-14 23:32 EST -------
It's possible. Frankly I was hoping that their GCC4 work would happen sooner
rather than later, but they're still working out 4.0 compatibility while the
world is moving on to 4.1 and beyond.
The spec actually has the ability to build minimally if the installed GCC
version matches the base GCC that GPC is being patched into. (Actually that's
pretty much required to avoid file conflicts.) The only real issue with that is
all of the patching that Red Hat generally does to GCC. In the past I haven't
had problems with this, however.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
17 years, 9 months
[Bug 181997] Review Request: gpc - The GNU Pascal compiler
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: gpc - The GNU Pascal compiler
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181997
bugzilla(a)redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package-
|list(a)redhat.com |review(a)redhat.com
------- Additional Comments From kevin(a)tummy.com 2006-08-14 22:36 EST -------
Would this package be helped any by the recent addition of the compat-gcc-34
package to core? (it's 3.4.6, not 3.4.5 however).
Ie, could this be reconfigured to just build the frontends and require compat-
gcc-34?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
17 years, 9 months