[Bug 219086] New: Review Request: perl-Geo-Functions - Standard Geo:: functions
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219086
Summary: Review Request: perl-Geo-Functions - Standard Geo::
functions
Product: Fedora Extras
Version: devel
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: normal
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: jpo(a)di.uminho.pt
QAContact: fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com
Spec URL:
ftp://perl.di.uminho.pt/pub/fedora/perl-Geo-Functions.spec
SRPM URL:
ftp://perl.di.uminho.pt/pub/fedora/perl-Geo-Functions-0.04-1.src.rpm
Description:
Standard Geo:: functions.
Note: the Geo::* modules are requirements of Net::GPSD
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
17 years, 5 months
[Bug 168690] Review Request: pyBackPack (GTK+ Python backup tool)
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: pyBackPack (GTK+ Python backup tool)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168690
------- Additional Comments From andy(a)andrewprice.me.uk 2006-12-10 17:43 EST -------
I agree that #36 is a big problem. It was introduced when I fixed the infinite
loop with symlinks bug and I think it might be due to files being stat-ed too
much but I won't know for sure until I investigate further, which will occur
after I've sorted out a handful of university deadlines and Christmas-related
business.
Bernard: Thanks for your testing work. It's very much appreciated.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
17 years, 5 months
[Bug 174377] Review Request: gnu-smalltalk - GNU Smalltalk
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: gnu-smalltalk - GNU Smalltalk
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174377
------- Additional Comments From mtasaka(a)ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-10 09:35 EST -------
Well,
* If rebuilding this package has already succeeded (for at least
one arch), please close this bug as CLOSED NEXTRELEASE.
* If rebuilding this package fails for a arch (for example,
on x86_64)
* disable x86_64 arch
* open a new bugzilla entry which tells that this package does not
build on x86_64 and make it block Bug 179259
* then close this bug as CLOSED NEXTRELEASE .
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
17 years, 5 months