2009/6/13 David Nielsen <gnomeuser(a)gmail.com>
2009/6/13 David Nielsen <gnomeuser(a)gmail.com>
>
>
> 2009/6/12 Stephen Shaw <sshaw(a)decriptor.com>
>
>> 2009/6/12 David Nielsen <gnomeuser(a)gmail.com>:
>> >
>> >
>> > 2009/6/11 Stephen Shaw <sshaw(a)decriptor.com>
>> >>
>> >> Any chance that someone was able to test out those spec files? They
>> >> should have fedora 11 in the openSUSE Build Service soon, so as soon
>> >> as they do that I can test them here as well. Should I be creating
>> >> bugs for each of these spec files?
>> >
>> > I apologize for not having had time to do this work, but I will see to
>> it
>> > tomorrow. I have been buried in other work for a while but tomorrow
>> should
>> > present a few hours of peace and quiet to test these for you.
>> >
>> > Also congratulations on your newly appointed openSUSE council seat.
>> >
>> > - David
>>
>>
>> Thanks!!! I figured that I'd add that as well since I don't have a
>> ton of thing on my plate ;)
>>
>> Also, thanks for taking a look at the packages... I did move the
>> fedora directory up a level. I'm not sure what's taking so long to
>> get fedora up and running on the openSUSE Board System, but as soon as
>> its there I'll start trying to get them up there as well.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Stephen
>>
>
> First up:
>
> the base build mono-uia which we have reviewed still do not apply the
> patch I provided which means it will not assemble a valid rpm on Fedora
> x86_64. Then when you try to install it in asks for mono(WindowsBase)
> 3.0.0.0 I assume our winforms or something requires updating but I will
> need your insight here.
>
Well doh, it helps when I actually install the mono-wincorefx package. Okay
time for more coffee
In Fedora 11 we only have
gtk-sharp2-2.12.7-4.fc11.x86_64
Is there a special reason you require 2.12.8 or can we lower the
requirement? If not I will need to request an update of this package before
we can proceed.