2009/6/13 David Nielsen <gnomeuser@gmail.com>


2009/6/13 David Nielsen <gnomeuser@gmail.com>



2009/6/12 Stephen Shaw <sshaw@decriptor.com>

2009/6/12 David Nielsen <gnomeuser@gmail.com>:
>
>
> 2009/6/11 Stephen Shaw <sshaw@decriptor.com>
>>
>> Any chance that someone was able to test out those spec files?  They
>> should have fedora 11 in the openSUSE Build Service soon, so as soon
>> as they do that I can test them here as well.  Should I be creating
>> bugs for each of these spec files?
>
> I apologize for not having had time to do this work, but I will see to it
> tomorrow. I have been buried in other work for a while but tomorrow should
> present a few hours of peace and quiet to test these for you.
>
> Also congratulations on your newly appointed openSUSE council seat.
>
> - David


Thanks!!!  I figured that I'd add that as well since I don't have a
ton of thing on my plate ;)

Also, thanks for taking a look at the packages... I did move the
fedora directory up a level.  I'm not sure what's taking so long to
get fedora up and running on the openSUSE Board System, but as soon as
its there I'll start trying to get them up there as well.

Thanks,
Stephen

First up:

the base build mono-uia which we have reviewed still do not apply the patch I provided which means it will not assemble a valid rpm on Fedora x86_64. Then when you try to install it in asks for mono(WindowsBase) 3.0.0.0  I assume our winforms or something requires updating but I will need your insight here.

Well doh, it helps when I actually install the mono-wincorefx package. Okay time for more coffee

In Fedora 11 we only have
 gtk-sharp2-2.12.7-4.fc11.x86_64

Is there a special reason you require 2.12.8 or can we lower the requirement? If not I will need to request an update of this package before we can proceed.