Sure, will do that.
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016, 5:58 PM Laura Abbott <labbott(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On 06/13/2016 03:23 PM, Miguel Flores Silverio wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Miguel Flores Silverio <floresmigu3l(a)gmail.com>
There is already a scripts/generate-git-snapshot.sh. I don't know how you
managed to send a new copy.
If there are changes, can you just send an incremental patch?
> ---
> scripts/generate-git-snapshot.sh | 41
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+)
> create mode 100755 scripts/generate-git-snapshot.sh
>
> diff --git a/scripts/generate-git-snapshot.sh
b/scripts/generate-git-snapshot.sh
> new file mode 100755
> index 0000000..82772a5
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/scripts/generate-git-snapshot.sh
> @@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
> +#!/bin/sh
> +# This scripts allow for the generation of a git snapshot between the
upstream git
> +# tree ( Linus' version of the kernel ) and the fedora kernel.
> +
> +# Look to see if LINUX_GIT is set in local .bashrc
> +if[ -f ~/.bashrc ]
> +then
> + source ~/.bashrc
> +fi
> +
> +if [ ! -d "$LINUX_GIT" ]; then
> + echo "error: set \$LINUX_GIT to point at upstream git tree"
> + exit 1
> +fi
> +
> +VER=$(grep patch sources | head -n1 | awk '{ print $2 }' | sed
s/patch-// | sed s/-git.*// | sed s/.xz//)
> +
> +if [ -z "$VER" ] ;
> +then
> + VER=$(grep linux sources | head -1 | awk '{ print $2 }' | sed
s/linux-// | sed s/.tar.xz//)
> +fi
> +
> +OLDGIT=$(grep gitrev kernel.spec | head -n1 | sed s/%define\ gitrev\ //)
> +export NEWGIT=$(($OLDGIT+1))
> +
> +pushd $LINUX_GIT
> +
> +git diff v$VER.. > /tmp/patch-$VER-git$NEWGIT
> +xz -9 /tmp/patch-$VER-git$NEWGIT
> +DESC=$(git describe)
> +git rev-list --max-count=1 HEAD > /tmp/gitrev
> +popd
> +
> +mv /tmp/patch-$VER-git$NEWGIT.xz .
> +mv /tmp/gitrev .
> +
> +perl -p -i -e 's|%global baserelease.*|%global baserelease 0|'
kernel.spec
> +
> +perl -p -i -e 's|%define gitrev.*|%define gitrev $ENV{'NEWGIT'}|'
kernel.spec
> +
> +rpmdev-bumpspec -c "Linux $DESC" kernel.spec
> --
> 2.7.4
>