Roland McGrath wrote:
> I presume you're referring to the likes of say kernel
2.6.21-gitX, which
> was post-2.6.21, but pre-2.6.22-rc1? Crap. Hadn't thought about that
> case. Okay, will have to do some further twiddling to cover that case...
Yes, that's what I meant. Faking it as "rc0" might be the easiest thing
to
keep the scheme's release numbers increasing.
It winds up being a touch out of phase with reality, since 2.6.21-git1
ends up being called 2.6.22-rc0-git1, but the updated attached patch
does account for this case now in that fashion. If we call it anything
else, its out of N-V-R order. Ughlay, but still much closer than we've
been, and outside of that window, it should be spot-on to see what
exactly we're packaging.
Oh, and this version does result in a fully-completed rpm build (also
has the kernel-vanilla fix).
--
Jarod Wilson
jwilson(a)redhat.com