From: Philipp Rudo on
gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2917#note_1789...
Hi Emanuele,
your implementation is different to what I originally suggested. But I must
admit that your implementation is better. With my suggestion it would have
been hard to get a reasonable name for the final addon.
What I don't understand is why you are building the exact same set of addons
for every kernel without adding a .uname section. The way I see it we either
ship one set of addons for every arch/variant. But then it would be better to
have a separate noarch rpm so we don't need to rebuild it over and over again.
Or we want to be able to ship arch/variant-specific addons. But then you need
to set the .uname section and a way to tell uki_addon.py to build addons only
for certain archs/variants. Personally I would again simply copy what is done
for the kernel configs and re-use the directory structure there (if we choose
to go this way).