On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 4:54 AM, Paul Bolle <pebolle(a)tiscali.nl> wrote:
Hi Josh,
On do, 2016-04-14 at 13:17 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
> On do, 2016-04-14 at 07:09 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > lguest is a toy, and one that doesn't work very well it seems.
> > Probably OK to disable it for now in any case. Let me think it
> > over.
>
> What I wasn't sure about is whether we should bother setting
> CONFIG_LGUEST (ie, the host side support). I kept it enabled. Perhaps
> that could be dropped too.
Nothing seems to have happened after this. So I'm guessing you decided
to keep Lguest guest support enabled (perhaps because you expect to drop
OLPC support instead).
Did I guess right?
No, I just forgot about it. I'll drop LGUEST today.
josh