[Bug 1210186] New: plexus-active-collections should be retired
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210186
Bug ID: 1210186
Summary: plexus-active-collections should be retired
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: plexus-active-collections
Assignee: yyang(a)redhat.com
Reporter: mizdebsk(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: java-sig-commits(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
mizdebsk(a)redhat.com, yyang(a)redhat.com
I believe that plexus-active-collections package should be retired in Fedora
rawhide. Reason: project has been retired upstream. I've checked and nothing
requires or bulid-requires this package.
Package owner: Can you retire the package in f23? Or if you prefer I can retire
it - in this case just orphan the package and let me know and I will retire it
myself.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=A3oSlUjMY9&a=cc_unsubscribe
7 years, 4 months
[Bug 1337994] New: Please include Jenkins in EPEL
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1337994
Bug ID: 1337994
Summary: Please include Jenkins in EPEL
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: jenkins
Assignee: msrb(a)redhat.com
Reporter: jindrich.novy(a)morganstanley.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: java-sig-commits(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
mizdebsk(a)redhat.com, msrb(a)redhat.com
Hi,
it would be hugely beneficial if there would be a possibility to introduce
Jenkins to EPEL6 and 7 branches. Assuming you have already received such a
request in history. Is there a technical reason which prevents Jenkins from
being included in EPEL?
Thanks for looking into it.
Kind Regards,
Jindrich Novy
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
7 years, 5 months
[Bug 1317805] New: %jpackage_script is not compatible with XDG specification
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1317805
Bug ID: 1317805
Summary: %jpackage_script is not compatible with XDG
specification
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: jpackage-utils
Assignee: extras-orphan(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: jvanek(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: akurtako(a)redhat.com, extras-orphan(a)fedoraproject.org,
java-sig-commits(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
jerboaa(a)gmail.com, msrb(a)redhat.com,
sochotni(a)redhat.com
the %jpackage_script generates also:
# Source user prefs
if [ -f $HOME/.LauncherName ] ; then
. $HOME/.LauncherName
fi
Which looks really bad. $XDG_* should be followed.
So the correct snippet should be (not tested):
XCFG=$XDG_CONFIG_DIR
if [ "xXCFG" == "x" ] ; then
XCFG=$HOME/.config/.LauncherName
else
XCFG=$XCFG/.LauncherName
fi
if [ -f $XCFG ] ; then
. $XCFG
fi
%jpackage_script is an old macro. It was created before XDG spec
existed. It would be nice to use standardized location for config files,
but I can't just move config file location as it would break user config
files.
Perhaps a second XDG-compliant location could be added next to existing
non-standard config location. Or we could introduce a totally new macro,
which would solve this and many of other issues. New macro would allow
to migrate packages gradually.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
7 years, 6 months