On 04/23/15 18:24, Max Filippov wrote:
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 11:56 PM, Mark Wielaard
<mjw(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 11:20:35PM +0300, Max Filippov wrote:
>>> What do the test results look like on your setup?
>>
>> I haven't tried that. Is there an easy way to run tests on a system
>> without native compiler?
>
> Not easily. The tests involve building programs and a couple of tests
> that run over some of the object files just created. So you'll have to
> build everything first, including the tests check_PROGRAMS, and copy
> the whole build dir to the system, then run make check there (which means
> the system does need to have at least make, sh, sed, etc. on it.
# TOTAL: 126
# PASS: 44
# SKIP: 0
# XFAIL: 0
# FAIL: 82
# XPASS: 0
# ERROR: 0
The log is attached.
A lot of tests failed because elfutils were built with --disable-progs
(otherwise the build fails), and some test binaries failed to build
because they call functions not available in uClibc.
You might also want to take a look a [1]. I had to produce a series of
patches to get it to build. What did you do about mtrace()?
Ref.
[1]
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=470884
--
Anthony G. Basile, Ph. D.
Chair of Information Technology
D'Youville College
Buffalo, NY 14201
(716) 829-8197