On Wed, 2013-10-30 at 16:25 +0100, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
On Wed, 30 Oct 2013 15:47:06 +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> I do want as much information as we can give. But IMHO the default
> should be as basic as possible. Lets do introduce a -v flag (or some
> others for symbol name demangling, module names, source/line, function
> arguments, etc.). But not right now. Lets first get the basic
> functionality in. I am very eager to finally see this committed!
Modifying the default output in released package is not good.
So introduced the "-v" flag now.
Sorry, I should have been clearer.
I don't mind the - 1 in the default output as it was.
I meant that "other extras" should go under some future --verbose flag.
That said, I also don't mind how you did it now. At least now we have a
--verbose flag that we can add more stuff under. The change looks good.
Thanks,
Mark